healthYou know, when I first started seeing all those products at Walmart that said "zero trans fats" but also included ingredients like "partially hydrogenated oils" I wondered......I happen to know that partially hydrogenated oils are seriously harmful. They essentially cause receptor sites to be slow, kind of arthritic in a way. They no longer can work properly. I wondered....how truthful are those labels about trans fat? Here's an article from someone else who also wondered...and what he found out! I also have more information on trans fats here:
| |
| The Hidden Government Truth About Zero Trans-Fats Labels | Related: HEALTHY WEIGHT LOSS |
Deceptive Zero Trans-Fats Labeling, Government Lies, FDA Censorship, Cherry Producers Under Fire...and more!
When the government announced the new labeling law that forced food processors to list on their label the trans-fats amount their product contained, we were delighted. I’m afraid that our joy was a bit misplaced.
As is so typical of our government, we did not get the whole truth.
What the government didn’t tell us in their announcement was that food processors were permitted to include in their product up to ½ percent of trans-fats and call that zero trans-fats on the label. Perfëctly lëgal. Canadians are better off then we are in the U.S. Their government calls zero .2 percent.
I don’t know about you, but when someone says zero to me, that means zilch, nothing, none, not an inkling of trans-fats in the product!
So once again the government has lied to us when it comes to protecting our health by leading us to believe that when the label says zero trans-fats, it really can mean some trans-fats.
There is nothing we can do with regard to the new label law and the FDA, or the USDA, but there sure is plenty we can do as far as food processors are concerned. We have the power of the dollar.
Withhold your purchase of any processed food. Write to the companies first. Tell them you know that it’s legal to put up to ½ percent trans-fats in their product even though they have listed it to be zero trans-fats.
You want to know how much trans-fats they have included and you want it in writing. None of these companies will write you that there are no trans-fats if there really are, for fear of a massive law suit.
Actually, better still, the best thing you can do for your health is to not buy processed foods because the lies from the government are quite broad.
They lie when they say it’s ok to eat small amounts of the thousands of different chemicals they have allowed food processors to add to their processed food without listing them on the labels. That’s like saying it’s ok to eat a little bit of poison.
Food processors add different combinations of these chemicals to their processed foods to enhance the flavor of their other wise tasteless products. Perfëctly lëgal, and you pay the price for it in developed diseases.
Even more outrageous is the FDA and their censorship that prohibits growers of fresh fruits from disseminating scientific information about the health benefits of eating fresh fruit.
A good example of this censorship is what the FDA did to the cherry growers and their distributors.
They had listed on their web site the scientifically proven health benefits derived from eating cherries. Scientific studies such as: Kang SY, Seeram NP, Nair MG, Bourquin LD. Tart cherry anthocyanins inhibit tumor defelopment in Apc (Min) mice and reduce proliferation of human colon cancer cells. Cancer Lett. 2003 May 8; 194(1)L13-9 were listed.
(There are many of these studies too numerous to list here.)
Instead of the FDA applauding these findings and encouraging people to eat cherries, on October 17, 2005, the FDA banned all information about cherries health benefits.
Their letter was sent to 29 companies that market cherries to cease and desist publicizing scientific data about cherries.
According to the FDA, when they publish this data, the cherries become unapproved drugs and are subject to seizure. The FDA went on further to say that if they continued to inform consumers about these scientific studies, they would be subject to criminal prosecution.
This is real. This is not a fantasy. The FDA has the power to do this, I quote from their letter: “These claims cause your product to be a drug as defined in section 201 (g). Because this product is not generally recognized as safe and effective when used as labeled, it is also defined as a new drug in section 201 (p). Under section 505 of the Act(21 USC355), a new drug may not be legally marketed in the United States without an approved New Drug Application.”
Can you believe they are talking about cherries? And why did the FDA pick on cherries? Simple---because it threatens the pharmaceutical industries sale of drugs for cancer.
Cherries are not the only natural food product that the FDA has censored. It has successfully censored proven health claims of all too many natural foods and nutritional supplements to the detriment of the public.
We must not let this outrageous censorship continue and we now have an opportunity with new allies to hopefully finally prohibit the FDA from preventing us from learning the truth about the health benefits of different foods and nutritional supplements.
On November 10, 2005, a bill was introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives that would prohibit the FDA from denying consumers access to truthful health information. The bill’s name is the Health Freedom Protection Act (H.R.4282).
Here is an excerpt from the speech of the original sponsors:
“Because of the FDA’s censorship of truthful health claims, millions of Americans may suffer with diseases and other health care problems they may have avoided by using dietary supplements. For example, the FDA prohibited consumers from learning how folic acid reduces the risk of neural tube defects for four years after the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommended every woman of childbearing age take folic acid supplements to reduce neural tube defects. This FDA action contributed to an estimated 10,000 cases of preventable neural tube defects!”
You can see from this how important it is that each and every one of us write or email our Congressmen, Congresswomen, and Senators that you want them to pass H.R. 4282 (Health Freedom Protection Act).
If you do not know their email address or office address, go to: www.visi.com/juan/congress . Click on the down arrow and click on your state. Then enter your zip code and click on “Submit it”. That is all you have to enter. The name and addresses of your representatives will come up.
Tell them to stop the FDA’s censorship. Tell them you have a right to know how to protect your health. Tell them to pass the bill.
Do it now. If you wait, it won’t get done. This is too important to let slip. Pass this email on to as many as you can. Thanks for your efforts.
To your good health and longevity,
Ira Marxe
CEO, Good Health Supplement
P.S. Don't forget to read our past HMM articles. You will find the quick link below today's article. And remember..."The road to good health is an easy one to follow when making the right choices." Thank you.
Ira Marxe is CEO of Good Health Supplements. GHS is dedicated to
your good health offering you affordable, leading edge technology in
anti-aging, cardiovascular, multi-vitamin and digestive nutritional
supplementation. Call 928-203-9700 or 1- 888- 824-3745.
Go to: Good Health Supplements.
Health Disclaimer: The information contained in this or any GHS related articles or materials are not intended to take the place of personal medical advice from your health care professional. Any action taken based on the contents found in this or any GHS related articles, materials or information is at the sole discretion of the reader. Readers should consult appropriate health professionals as necessary on any matter relating to their health and well-being. Any information or opinions provided here or in any GHS related articles, materials or information are believed to be accurate and sound, however no GHS personal or associates will be held responsible on behalf of any reader who fails to consult appropriate health authorities with respect to their individual health care, and the author or publisher of any information is not responsible for errors or omissions
